In some kidney surgery cases, the surgeon will conduct a laparoscope on the patient. This is done to make the patient’s recuperating time shorter. However, with kidney cancer it is not the case.
During the laparoscope procedure the surgeon will conduct the operation through a small incision in the skin, with the camera attached to the device. According to research performed at four hospitals around the globe, laparoscope surgery was compared to the general open surgery on kidney cancer patients. The results publicized in the Urology Journal, stated that the same results were derived from these two different procedures.
The research found that patients whose kidney cancer were removed by the laparoscope procedure, progressed better in comparison with patients on who open surgery was performed. Furthermore, they also spent a shorter time in hospital, resuming their work in a shorter time and they also loss less blood.
However, whilst the laparoscope procedure is better for patients, it proved to be much more time consuming and complex for the surgeon. Actually it may take medical professionals some years to determine if a new kind of treatment will have the same outcome as the standard kinds of surgery procedures which are performed and available over a period of many years.
Doctor Andrew J Portis together with other colleagues performed procedures on 133 kidney cancer patients. During these operations kidney tumours were removed together with any remaining normal kidneys. Up till January 1996, he determined that 64 of these patients who undergone the laparoscopic treatment, fared better regarding to blood loss and was also hospitalized for a shorter time. However, it consumed much more of the surgeons’ time to do the surgery. Open surgery was conducted on the remaining 69 patients.
Another result which emerged was that no difference occurred between the two groups of patients who had survived. The patients of both groups also had the same ratio of the recurrence of the kidney cancer. The results of this study were based on four standards which provided them with four ways when it came to the comparison of these two different procedures. It became evident that the laparoscope patients fared just as well when compared to the patients which received open surgery.
In future chances may improve for surgeons using this type of kidney surgery due to the fact that medical practitioners will become more clued up and skilful using this equipment.